The Chinada High Command Again Makes Fun of Creating a Lab Monkey
and Mocks the Custodian Chief Executive as the Constitutionally and
Internationally Legitimate Interim Political Leader of Canada
and
The Reverse Onus Burden of Proof: The Custodian-in-Council's
Entitled to Employ it During 'Iron Fist' Prosecutions
© 2010 Brad Kempo B.A. LL.B.
Barrister & Solicitor
Because the Custodian Chief became a successful multi-decade stealth cognition technologies human experimentation victim, and as a result of a deluded belief in being invincible, insulated and immune in perpetuity, the Chinada leadership repeatedly made fun of him. They did so again during the Evil-ympics as part of the 600 events, in 60 venues in 60 days.
Believing that behind sovereign borders they are incapable of being purged and punished, the malfeasant repeatedly got kicks out of the coalition assertion their favorite lab monkey would eventually govern them as opposed to the other way around. The first initiative that articulated this view was concomitant with the Triggering Event. The first cover of Dogville’s Georgia Straight in April 2007 featured a justice and Canada attire colored gorilla climbing Parliament’s clock tower.*
* First referred to in How Canada's Rich, Powerful and Chinese Reacted to 'Dogville' and 'The Manchurian Candidate'
For the Hades Games another way was conceived to again deride the coalition’s determination to effect regime change and put their two-decade victim at the political helm. The motivation for the genesis of the production is known. It was an existing Broadway-style musical that premiered at the Beijing Olympics then and booked because of its geo-significance. It’s writer, producer and director gave an interview to the Global TV – an Asper media asset – in which he states this fact. (View video) The Vancouver Sun, another voice of everything that’s wrong, illegal and immoral about the western portion of Canada, sent a reporter to interview him; and the production’s geo-significance wasn’t lost on newspaper executives. She was attired in the bright color of quantum. (View video)
The person behind the musical is Dennis K. Law. His bio states “Retired from a career as a well-known surgeon in Denver, Colorado, Dr. Law started his interest in the field of entertainment by producing ‘Warriors of Virtue’, a high budget family feature film distributed by MGM, Warner Brothers and Columbia Artist worldwide. In China, he also produced a prize-winning CCTV children’s film Xiwa as well as the acclaimed television series ‘April Rhapsody’. After the acquisition of The Centre In Vancouver For Performing Arts by the Law family in early 2002, Dr. Law became the C.E.O. and President of The Centre and its associated production company Sight, Sound & Action”.
Originally the ‘Ford Centre for the Performing Arts’, the venue is a high-end site and thus who owns it and how it’s managed is within the exclusive control of the western members of the triangle of power and wealth. It will take an investigation to determine whether he’s an innocent party or is complicit in advancing unlawful Chinese and Canadian interests. What dispenses with the need to impose a reverse onus burden of proof – that high standard of assuming guilt and requiring ‘Iron Fist’ tribunal defendants to prove their innocence, and which most Canadians charged will face – is being an emigrated American. He either is a geo-political pawn or was recruited into the fold. If the former, he keeps the asset. If the latter it'll be seized and held in trust by the Custodian-in-Council and likely put up for auction.
The reverse onus burden of proof was discussed by Canada’s highest court. It is stated in R. v. Oakes, [1986] 1 S.C.R. 103, per Dickson C.J. and Chouinard, Lamer, Wilson and Le Dain JJ.:
To establish that a limit is reasonable and demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society, two central criteria must be satisfied. First, the objective, which the measures responsible for a limit on a Charter right or freedom are designed to serve, must be "of sufficient importance to warrant overriding a constitutionally protected right or freedom": R. v. Big M Drug Mart Ltd., supra, at p. 352. The standard must be high in order to ensure that objectives which are trivial or discordant with the principles integral to a free and democratic society do not gain s. 1 protection. It is necessary, at a minimum, that an objective relate to concerns which are pressing and substantial in a free and democratic society before it can be characterized as sufficiently important. [...] Parliament's concern that drug trafficking be decreased was substantial and pressing. Its objective of protecting society from the grave ills of drug trafficking was self-evident, for the purposes of s. 1, and could potentially in certain cases warrant the overriding of a constitutionally protected right.
To paraphrase the Supreme Court of Canada, the Custodian-in-Council’s concern that Chinese de facto governance and militarization and the trans-generational institutionalized corruption and criminality that procured, perpetuated and protected it be decreased was substantial and pressing. The need to protect thirty million Canadians and the nation’s neighbor and allies and the rest of 21st century civilization from the grave ills of pubescent psychopathology and all it entails is self-evident, for the purposes of s. 1 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and in 'Iron Fist' prosecutions warrant the overriding of a constitutionally protected right.
The purchase of this arts venue this is another example how the Chinese are strategically positioned by and for the country's 'establishment'; producing as much propaganda victories for those complicit in and loyal to the Chinada agenda as turning important institutions into forums to advance unlawful causes and interests.
